Welcome to Questler!
  
Quest View Back
 
tip Why is it that a lot of religious people refuse to understand such as freedom?
 
 

Posted by Roba on 06.01.2008
28 comments  | 405 views | Bookmark this post on del.icio.us. | Digg this post on digg.com. | Thumb this up at StumbleUpon. | Submit this post on reddit.com. | Submit this post on newsvine.com. | Share on Facebook. | Submit this post on myspace.com. | Search Technorati for links to this post. | Submit this post on twitter.com.
 
Clarification:
Posted on 06.06.2008
 
Login to post your comment or

Comments tagged with "religion freedom"
Newest | Oldest | Most rated
Posted by Nadine on 30.09.2008
 

Freedom is relative. 

The way I see it is that the 'religous' people you refer to have a hard time allowinq/accepting of themselves and others questions, questioning, evolution of thought and practice.  Since they cannot accept intellectual exploration, they inevitably have rigid rules about what should and shouldn't be.

The root of that is fear.

Rating  0 
Posted by Fouad on 24.08.2008
 

@kurt, thank you.

so i guess its. whatever! or hell whatever! or maybe ya ya ya whatever! or or maybe bla bla bla whatever

@kurt, whatever holds alot of meanings "Urban Dictionary". i think ill go with 13.

Rating  0 
Posted by Ashraf on 27.07.2008
 

You do follow the laws of the country you're in don't you? How can you be free when you're governed by law? How about defining freedom for a start?

Rating  0 
Posted by kurt on 30.06.2008
 

Would you please elaborate on the "what ever!"? Do you disagree with the sentiments of some, do you think what they are saying is irrelevant and should be ignored? What are your thoughts on the issue at hand?

Also, "whatever" in the context in which you are using is one word, not two. If you want to use "what ever" then it becomes a form of a question; i.e. "What ever happened to John last night?" It is not an exclamation statement but a question.

Rating  0 
Posted by Fouad on 29.06.2008
 

what ever!

Rating  0 
Posted by Shalabieh on 23.05.2008
 

Baker I think you should read my opnion on the matter here then... :)

 

http://shalabieh.wordpress.com/2008/03/01/i-am-a-very-selfish-woman/

Rating  0 
Posted by Baker on 23.05.2008
 

Dear Shalabieh, usually saying YES or NO, it has nothing to do with harming people, i'm speaking of the simplest matters, i become a free person when i say NO to a gathering i'm invited to but i don't feel like going, saying YES will mean that i will go for the sake of others but not mine. my YES or NO shouldn't harm anyone, because i will not say them unless i'm asked, and when i'm asked i'm free to say either or. regardless of the consequences, my YES or NO should be true to me, giving me a true moment that i deserve.

Rating  0 
Posted by Shalabieh on 23.05.2008
 

baker... I like your definition of freedom. And the dicussion that ensued. I think that rredom of choice ultimately means freedom like you mentioned but you can not exclude others from environment and making those choices. What is a YES for you may have disasterous concequences.

 

You may think it is necesarry to say yes or applicable to say yes when for someone else that yes may be very harmful.

that is why I think and belive, if you will, that the clause so long aas you dont hurt others is necessary.  

Rating  0 
Posted by Baker on 23.05.2008
 

it can't get simple before it's complicated.  brilliance comes only after the chaos!

Rating  0 
Posted by Ghassan on 23.05.2008
 

for a guy who's looking for simpler answers you sure made it to darn complicated.. but hay, you're free to do that :)

Rating  0 
Posted by Baker on 23.05.2008
 

One more thing, what is conveyed to us as a religion is not a religion, in fact, there are no religions, there is only me, you, he and she, with a powerful spirit within u. Religion doesn't exist. me only exist, well spirited.

Rating  0 
Posted by Baker on 23.05.2008
 

I'm not against drinking or sex, in fact, both gets you flying and liberated. however, the concept of freedom was misspelled over the years.. i disagree that freedom means "doing what you want sa longest as you want, without hurting others".

Plus, in a previous note i wrote, i said that whoever proposes a belief system for you is lying on you. no one needs anyone's system. create your own, live your own freedom. my definition of freedom works well for me, might not work well for you or others :) saying YES whenever i want, NO whenever i want and NOTHING whenever i want is my FREEDOM. the rest of definitions are products. Religious have nothing to do with freedom. guess what, religious people i guess are freeier than most people, they object what they want, they damage as they want, they talk and express better than the mass they live within. while others, sit at home afraid to confront them. go out and say NO to them. that is what i call FREEDOM :)

Rating  0 
Posted by Ghassan on 23.05.2008
 

 

"Freedom suppose to make you a better person".. no not really, freedom is exactly as it is.. to be free in doing what you want as longest you don’t interfere with other people freedoms, what you think is bad, others may think is good.. take those examples; drinking doesn't automatically makes you "drunk"! there's a hug difference between the two.. the same as having sex to satisfy your human needs doesn’t makes you sex addict.. so you see you have your own view on what is good or not for others, which those others may not agree with you on.. that’s why you can’t force your opinions on others.. which is exactly what religion is doing

Rating  0 
Posted by Baker on 22.05.2008
 

Dear Ghassan, we need to get focused in here to discover new ways of exploring things around us, alcohol and sex are not a measuring tools for freedom. that is called "Choice". Freedom suppose to make you a better person, and not a drunken and instictually a sexual driven person.

Freedom to me is how i explained it. :)

Rating  0 
Posted by Ghassan on 22.05.2008
 

ok Baker.. glad to see you on all those posts, simple examples were mentioned previously.. alcohol and sex (out side marriage).. this is what the post means about religion and freedom.

 

 

Rating  0 
Posted by Baker on 22.05.2008
 

Religion or religious people has nothing to do with freedom. i don't know what do you mean by freedom, but if it's the western concept of freedom then i disagree. the west has no freedom. they think and act within the rules set and applied by their superiors.

freedom in simple terms is "is to be able to say YES when YES is needed, to say NO when NO is needed and to say NOTHING when NOTHING is needed. only then there's freedom.

the rest of freedoms are PRODUCTS sold by governments to people, and by the end of the day, this peoduct becomes a "BELIEF SYSTEM" and whoever proposes a belief system for you obviously this someone is lying to you.

create your own freedom, your own belief system, your own YES, NO & NOTHING.

cheerz

Rating  0 
Posted by SXTZ on 13.04.2008
 

Was reading this old thing here and thought how about trying to see it from a different angle...

Freedom or human rights? It all boils down to very basic needs. To use religion to suppress/enforce a set of behaviour is wrong, it is a classic case of one mans meat is another mans poison. By the way "Muharramat" a lot has been lumped in under that category wrongfully so too. A lot of people put things in the Prohibited by religion box, when in fact they are not! Alcohol is one of them, it isn't mentioned as a prohibition in Quran, but it is said you should avoid it. 

Anyway that wasn't the discussion here, it was freedom. Freedom comes with responsibility, it comes with a respect for each others boundaries, unfortunately zealots want their freedom and when they get it they immediately turn around and take it away from everyone else.

Simple equation: You are free to do what you want as long as it doesn't harm anybody in the process, who you sleep with, what you do on the weekend etc. As long as you are not harming anyone then be free. But this is not the way of the moslem/arab world, everyone is up ineveryones business whether they have a right to be there or not!

Rating  0 
Posted by Noura on 01.04.2008
 

I was not voicing my opinion (by far)...

I was simply stating facts: If you approach an average religious person from Jordan (40 something male??) and ask about freedom and how it falls under religion I assure you its going to be regarded negatively: a catastrophic act of the new generation leading to social-dismemberment, bla bla bla,  As I previously said: “…religious people "refuse" to embrace freedom because of fear that it might open up doors that are inviolable to discuss because they are ignorant to what freedom really is, and lack the capacity to understand that the extent of freedom…”

 

Rating  0 
Posted by Ghassan on 31.03.2008
 

 

Sure.. I’ll elaborate:

What stroked me the most reading these comments is that you keep talking about the freedom of drinking (mahmoud) or sex out side of marriage (you) as if they where a bad side effects of freedom!!! actually this is the core of personal freedom.. people are entitled to have the life style/ behavior they want as longest they don't hurt other people... that's what it seemed religious/conservative people don't get by now, quote again:

"Do you believe people are free to beat their wives? free to take drugs? free to drink alcohol? free to overuse common-resources?"

Drinking alcohol, which is supposed to be a very basic right, is right there in the middle between taken drugs and overuse of common-resources.. hehehe, that's hilarious, it's seems only gangsters and mass murders drink alcohol.. and I've been drinking alcohol since the age of 15 and didn't know it!

quote again (from you this time):

"..and lack the capacity to understand that the extent of freedom and how only one small part of it is sexual freedom."

!! why you keep talking about sexual behavior like it was a taboo or a capital crime!! I really still don't get that mentality, I personally think that kids speeding on the roads and public smoking is the real issues of freedom we should be talking about.. not drinking and sex and spiky hairy (yes I'm referring to the rumor that spread a couple of weeks ago about banning spiky hair)..

What I think the problem with religious people that they think their ideas are divine and can not be questioned... well, it's not!

 

Was that enough or would you like me to elaborate even more..

 

 

Rating  0 
Posted by Noura on 31.03.2008
 

I don't understand what your getting at?? People do have sex (we know!!) that is not the issue,, Sexual freedom and how its linked to religion and freedom is,,

I was just trying to explain, so do you care to elaborate?

Rating  0 
Posted by Ghassan on 31.03.2008
 

I was browsing some old topics on Questler and I found this, and start reading it.. and I got amused by some of the comments:


mahmoud:""free" to drink alcohol?"... duh, yes they are.. lol... there are big big difference between beat up you wife and drinking or having casual sex or..., the difference is obviously your free as longest your not hurting any body else, it's as simple as that.. it's not a matter of "point of view" or "perspective".


Noura: "...only one small part of it is sexual freedom" people HAVE SEX... get over it!

Rating  0 
Posted by Noura on 12.02.2008
 

Maybe it’s because of the misconception of freedom, and what it is, I mean look at what everybody linked freedom with: wife beating, drinking, killing...

Further more in our society (Arab culture) especially the older generations, freedom or being "free" is often associated with sexual freedom, or leads to sexual activity, and that is a BIG taboo and one of the muharamat (Sins).

In short, I believe religious people "refuse" to embrace freedom because of fear that it might open up doors that are inviolable to discuss because they are ignorant to what freedom really is, and lack the capacity to understand that the extent of freedom and how only one small part of it is sexual freedom.  

 

 

Rating  0 
Posted by Shalabieh on 12.02.2008
 

Roba we never heard back from you on the questions below... I'd lvoe to hear more from your end about what you meant and what you think on the matter.

Rating  0 
Posted by alma on 10.01.2008
 

Having "freedom" and being "free" to do something is all very relative depending on one’s point of view and perspective. Is one "free" to drink alcohol, drive a car, and kill someone- no. Is someone "free" to beat his wife - also no. Is a religious person free to force someone not to drink- no.

Perhaps the question above refers to the abuse some religious persons, even perhaps a whole religion, inflicts on others’ freedoms. For example, being uncovered for a woman in public in Saudi Arabia is forbidden, her driving a car is also forbidden. The government uses religion to justify such oppression.

I do not think that religious people do not understand “freedom” as a concept. I just think they have different definitions of freedom and what actions constitute freedom.

Rating  0 
Posted by Muhammad on 10.01.2008
 

Do you believe people are "free" to beat their wives? "free" to take drugs? "free" to drink alcohol? "free" to overuse common-resources?

You are just as religious as others on what you believe to be "correct" and we all must follow it.

So, maybe, this [right and wrong of otherss actions] is just part of human nature. We are not indiviuals, but rather we are parts in a big system, the being of humanity. This being developed long ago, and it going through a journey in history that leads somewhere.

I know you will say I did not get your question. I know that this question can be answered at a different level where I wouldn't take your words literally as I did, but I'm trying to guess how religious people would answer.

Rating  0 
Posted by alma on 08.01.2008
 

Generally, I think that having strong beliefs (that may lead to fundamentalism) in anything makes it difficult for someone to understand others’ points of view and the need for different freedoms. Religion and religious persons have whole systems that support their beliefs, such as the Vatican, governmental laws on marriage and divorce, etc., all of which justifies their beliefs as they are. Therefore, a freedom outside their set of freedoms is of no importance.

Rating  0 
Posted by Shalabieh on 07.01.2008
 

Razan I think the whole statement needs to be more specific too. This is a generalization that I do not agree with. There are a number of religous persons I know who belive in freedoms and practice them in a general sense.

So Roba like Razan I would love to hear from you in more specific terms what u mean by freedoms and what you mean by religious. As this topic is very interesting.

 

Thanks

Rating  0 
Posted by razano on 07.01.2008
 

I think because different people understand the term Freedom differently, and for religious folks it intersects with the roles of conduct in their different religions, so maybe its more into how the concept itself is integrated within each religion.

So let’s get a definition for freedom to use in this conversation as well as which religions are we talking about, what do you think?

Rating  0