Welcome to Questler!
  
Quest View Back
 
tip Watching Hillary Clinton's exit speech yesterday, made me think about how funny it is to hear her say Obama's name so much yesterday after months of fierce competition which got so hot and not very unprofessional at times. How do people make these jumps from against to with. Similar with what happened with Lebanon, suddenly everybody loves the other. Do they take us for fools? Or is this how politics is played?
 
 

Posted by razano on 08.06.2008
12 comments  | 103 views | Bookmark this post on del.icio.us. | Digg this post on digg.com. | Thumb this up at StumbleUpon. | Submit this post on reddit.com. | Submit this post on newsvine.com. | Share on Facebook. | Submit this post on myspace.com. | Search Technorati for links to this post. | Submit this post on twitter.com.
 
Rating  2 
 
 
 
Login to post your comment or

Newest | Oldest
Posted by kurt on 17.06.2008
 

Well, thank you Noura.

Posted by Noura on 15.06.2008
 

Well put kurt!

Posted by kurt on 15.06.2008
 

 

To grasp hold of power, you need money. With that money, you can then manipulate the political power to your advantage. Hardly do you ever see an individual in the US senate, presidents of any country, or a person in the current power structures who is not filthy rich.

As for the alternative party thought, we cannot just reduce it to “basically changing the names.” The Green Party in the United States changes perceptions, priorities, and many of the issues that are now status quo. Their candidate for presidency is a Black woman (not just one, but two of the characteristic most people were hung up on with the Democratic nominees). There is always the concern of course that the political system in which the Green Party exists in might eventually lead it to become another scenario of “changing the names,” but we have to start somewhere. Perhaps this somewhere is to demand and work for equal TV air-time for the alternative or other political parties, have these candidates tell us what they think. Most people do not even know that the Green Party’s candidate is a brilliant Black woman.

Change is slow, very slow. But unless we start somewhere, unless we decide to stop choosing the better of too evils for the fear of evil, change will not occur at all.  

Posted by Noura on 11.06.2008
 

To grasp and take control of "Power" you need politics, and politics is a dirty game where you have to back-stab to avoid getting back-stabbed.

Even if we all start supporting an "alternative party", we are basically changing the name but still playing the same game!!

I think what Hillary did is acceptable after all, she was campaigning for a Democratic party and it makes all the sense in the world to me, for her to support Obama, because now its not Obama VS McCain its the Democrats VS the Republicans! and Hillary is a Democrat!

Posted by Shalabieh on 11.06.2008
 

I woudl think that you can hold them accountable by being a watch dog over them, lobbying, using the media among other things. But we can keep saying we want poltical and social change but we do nothing about it.

Posted by Ghassan on 11.06.2008
 

ok, here's the key question: How do you hold them accountable??? practically, how do you do that, the big lobbies are the game players, not people like you and me, this is the ugly (true) face of American democracy..

Posted by Shalabieh on 10.06.2008
 

Alma I agree with you. But then how do you affect social change?  Apolitician will be elected whether you abstain or not.

 

Awarness, and education all take time and that means waiting for an uncertain result in the future with the new generation you are educating about their political rights and such.

Wouldnt it be better to elect someone and then hold them accountable?

Posted by alma on 10.06.2008
 

What i do find strange is that we follow them knowing that they are hypocrites. Rather than finding and/or supporting another party or an alternative thought, we continue to follow the status quo. How could i expect to affect social change if i continue to follow and choose from the better of the present "evils"?

Posted by Ghassan on 10.06.2008
 

 

 

it’s easy if you considered all politations a bunch hypocrites.. you won’t find any thing they do strange any more..

Posted by Shalabieh on 08.06.2008
 

why do you find it strange? the competed its not about democracy its about winning. The fought and fought ... played dirty sometimes and when a winner emerged the other conceded somewhat gracefully (sarcasm and humor here).

I dont think it is about democracy in anyway... democracy is just the name of the game and they played by its rules. It is not strange.

Posted by alma on 08.06.2008
 

i do not think this is how politics should be played, it is the fake sense of democracy and competition- all this bashing and disliking the other is covered up with the need to succeed, to become the chosen one. i think this is one issue that needs to be dealt with when we are in politics or life generally; we try to put the other down in order to seem more intelligent, capable, and right. Strange world indeed.

Posted by razano on 08.06.2008