Welcome to Questler!
  
Quest View Back
 
tip In discussions related to innovation, more emphasis is put on ideas (new ideas actually) than on tools that help coming up with these ideas. THat is true when you look at the end result, but, in the history of science I found that certain tools were indispensable to the progress of human kind.
 
 

Posted by sheikh on 23.08.2008
1 comment  | 30 views | Bookmark this post on del.icio.us. | Digg this post on digg.com. | Thumb this up at StumbleUpon. | Submit this post on reddit.com. | Submit this post on newsvine.com. | Share on Facebook. | Submit this post on myspace.com. | Search Technorati for links to this post. | Submit this post on twitter.com.
 
Clarification:

More specifically, can you imagine Biology without the "MICROSCOPE", or can you imagine Astronomy without the "TELESCOPE", or can imagine Physics without a host of tools: (SPECTROMETER, NUCLEAR REACTOR, etc), or can imagine this contemporary moment without the "COMPUTER"?

Tools played a huge role in the history of humanity and our progress... Tools open new dimensions, widen scopes, extend reaches. They have their own pressure on ideas, paradigms, perspectives transforming them from being implausible to plausible, etc.

What do you think?

 

 

 

 

Posted on 23.08.2008
 
Login to post your comment or

Newest | Oldest | Most rated
Posted by Shalabieh on 25.08.2008
 

tools give you the needed implements to focus on making the theory a reality. if the implement doesnt exist then you revert to the age old saying Neccessity is the mother of invention and once again you are back to ideas.

I think what you are saying can be argued in a circular fashion like which came first the chicken or the egg.

the tools or the ideas?

Rating  0